Search for: "Burton v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am by GuestPost
  Despite the Court in The State (Nicolaou) v An Bord Uchtala [1966] IR 567 declaring that all children have the same natural rights regardless of the marital status of their parents at birth it would appear that Minister Burton clearly disagrees with that sentiment. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
TTM (By his Litigation Friend TM) v London Borough of Hackney, East London NHS Foundation Trust; Secretary of State for Health –  Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the local authority, but not the detaining hospital, was liable to pay compensation to a person who had been unlawfully detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act  1983. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
Once again the issue of an applicant's eligibility for benefits has come before the courts in Sylwia Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:01 pm
Deason, 173 N.C.App. 297, 618 S.E.2d 776 (2005) (concluding no claim of wrongful discharge for age discrimination in North Carolina relying on legislative prerogative but in absence of constitutional basis for public policy); Burton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:20 am
[more here]Libyan death-penalty trial ends and the fate of six health workers accused of injecting more than 400 children with HIV should be known before Christmas.Oral argument in Burton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 4:55 pm
I really want to finish a post I started long ago on Shouse v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The plaintiff took Burton up on its offer. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:41 am
Decisions - 7th Circuit issues two Indiana decisions today In McKinney, Timothy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 pm by John Bellinger
  (Another relevant precedent is the authority Congress gave the President to waive the similarly ill-advised Title III of the Helms-Burton Act of 1996, which would allow individuals to sue Cuba for trafficking in expropriated property. [read post]