Search for: "City of Sacramento v. State of California"
Results 201 - 220
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Sacramento City Unified School District (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 821, reversing summary judgment with an interesting discussion of the primary assumption of risk doctrine.Hinesley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm
City of Sacramento (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1337. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:31 am
City and County of San Francisco (1953) 260 P.2d 55, 59, a California Supreme Court decision. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916, Inc., of 1340 Burlington Street, North Kansas City, Mo., failed to file the disclosure reports with state and federal authorities for the calendar years 2006, 2007 and 2008, according to a consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:23 am
But again, as stated, the Fielder decision is a narrowly construed case, as it only applies to premises liability actions against public entities in California. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:19 am
See also Rowland v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:39 pm
City of Rancho Cordova (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 703 and Sacramento Old City Association v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:26 pm
In the case, Lane v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Click Here BP in talks to settle Texas City fine -OSHA memo. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am
pid=20601087&sid=a7zD382h2EM8http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/cirm-hires-attorney-not-registered.html***Related to "City of Hope," readers might want to review the case "City of Hope v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:42 am
Tags: California, deep pocket, jackpot justice, noneconomic damages, pedestrian, personal responsibility, vicarious liability Related posts Carelessness for millions in New York City (15) Driver falls asleep: jury blames Ford to tune of $61M (14) December 2 roundup (1) City streets not safe to drive 100-120 mph on (6) Weidner v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm
Having graduated from Berkeley Law last year and admitted to the state bar in December, Cruz is now the California attorney of record on a legal team challenging the law with a lawsuit filed yesterday in the Northern District, according to the Associated Press. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:34 am
As Church's claim is a state law claim for retaliation, the California Court of Appeal decision in Mamou v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:34 am
As Church's claim is a state law claim for retaliation, the California Court of Appeal decision in Mamou v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
Mexico's attorney general has challenged the law in the Supreme Court.Public debates"Same-Sex Marriage: State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:08 am
California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
