Search for: "David N. v. Social Services"
Results 201 - 220
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
For example, In the Matter of Balbin involved excessive entanglement, as the court had to determine whether, under an earlier version of the statute, the church in fact needed the minister’s services. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The IP Court of Venice held that a work created by a lawyer for their client in the provision of legal services was protected by copyright law. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Judges cannot escape that current any more than other mortals.Benjamin N. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
The survivors can recover any loss of economic support, any lost services, and other traditional types of pecuniary damages. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
By: David A. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/J9p95f (Sharon Nelson) Is Social Media Disrupting Your Trials? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(N. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
” Id. at 430 U.S. 482, 496 n.17 (1977). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
Ore.), and Nan Nolan (N. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Aaron David Miller will moderate the discussion. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Weisberg, Walter Floersheimer Professor of Constitutional Law, Benjamin N. [read post]
