Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 201 - 220 of 2,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2013, 3:59 pm by Jim Walker
  Why does Carnival Corporation (the parent company) do this? [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
Felderhof was well founded and necessary to the defense, given the unfair prosecution and conduct of and by the Ontario Securities Commission both before and during Phase 1 of the trial. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:52 am
Christmas Day turned tragic for 1-year old Marice Love and his family of Clewiston, Florida. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 3:15 pm by Bryant Walker Smith
This critical reason, which is “often the last failure in the causal chain,” is “an important element in the sequence of events leading up to a crash” but “may not be the cause of the crash” and does not “imply the assignment of fault to a vehicle, driver, or environment, in particular. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
Rule 76(1) and (2)(c) EPC does not contain any further requirements regarding the content or quality of the notice of opposition. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:28 am by MBettman
Even if R.C. 5321.04 was not a negligence per se statute, the Tenants argue that Ohio law does not require a landlord to know of the exact defect for liability to attach. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Referral of a point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appealby the President of the European Patent Office(Article 112(1)(b) EPC)Under Article 112(1)(b) EPC the President of the European Patent Office refers the following points of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:1. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the effect relating to improving pet activity is not a new technical effect in the sense of G 2/88 and cannot confer novelty on the subject-matter of granted claim 1 over the disclosure of D4, D6 and D7. [2.8] The respondent maintained that an improvement in the health of a pet did not mean that the activity of the pet was increased. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
"Although the notice of institution sets a deadline for initial disclosures, "it does not constitute an 'order of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board relating to disclosure' within the contemplation of Trademark Rule 2.120(g)(1). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:12 am by Sebastian Brady, Cody M. Poplin
A quick glance reveals that other issues get way more airtime than Guantanamo does: Drones are discussed 88 times, for example; Guantanamo, only 24. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:21 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Since none of the details mentioned are present in the description, the description alone does not directly and unambiguously disclose these details to the person skilled in the art.The same is true for Figure 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
Please note, however, that the American Academy of Pediatrics does NOT recommend swimming classes as the primary means of drowning prevention for children younger than 4. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Schroden
  Myth 1: The Taliban have captured $88 billion worth of weapons and equipment. [read post]