Search for: "Elias v Elias"
Results 201 - 220
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2013, 1:26 am
Lewison LJ distinguished the case of Greenwich Community Law Centre v Greenwich LBC on the basis that:it was a decision of the formulation of general policy which “takes place against the background that everyone affected by the policy will have at least three protected characteristics” (age, race and sex);“Elias LJ was looking to the future, rather than dealing with whether a breach had taken place in the past in relation to a particular case”… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Kaplan and Dignity Health v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
Kelly v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:54 am
Steve Elias, Team Leader-Business License Research Team, Corporation Service Company [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
The case is Louichi Taniguchi v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Elias both gave concurring judgments. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:40 pm
Keen News Service for 365.com, 01/13/10 [See also this related post by journalist Karen Ocamb.]NCLR Senior Counsel Shannon Minter, Perry v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Elias H. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 3:01 pm
A recent article found in the July/August 2009 issue of Probate & Property by Sebastian V. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Prohibiting a patron of a public library from access to the library for violation of the library's Code of ConductR.T. v Freeport Memorial Library, Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision #17,060The Freeport Memorial Library[Library] R.T.'s library use privileges were being suspended for a period of one year due to repeated violations of the Library’s Code of Conduct [Code] policy, contending that over a period of eight separate days, R.T. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am
As one footnote, note that the pivotal "research exemption" case of Madey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:21 am
This was the case in Avid Dating Life, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
Groch v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
Elias Tesfa, FA1202001427761 (Nat. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
As set out by Elias P [at 45] in McClintock v Department of Constitutional Affairs [2008] IRLR 29 it is not enough ‘to have an opinion based on some real or perceived logic or based on information or lack of information available’. ii. [read post]
