Search for: "Foote v. State Bar" Results 201 - 220 of 748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The court stated that knowledge of zoning prior to purchase "does not bar purchaser from testing the validity of the zoning ordinance. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The court stated that knowledge of zoning prior to purchase "does not bar purchaser from testing the validity of the zoning ordinance. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm by Eric Segall
 Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm by Peter Margulies
The court started off on the right foot: the states have standing and the EO is reviewable. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court has consistently (if incorrectly) construed the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution as embodying a principle of “sovereign immunity” that bars suits against states themselves or state-level entities (like a state legislature) in federal court unless the state consents or Congress has validly abrogated the state’s immunity, neither of which the complaint alleges in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]