Search for: "Graves v. Powers" Results 201 - 220 of 1,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Oertwich v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China  (2021年8月20日第十三届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议通过)(Passed at the 30th meeting of the Standing… [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
  Far more interesting is the emergence of the non- (and near-)apex regional powers and others. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 5:09 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
A central issue in the case is whether Trump is entitled to official immunity from civil liability under Nixon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 9:48 am by Evan Brown
Looking to the test set out in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:50 pm by Matthew Guariglia
  TAKE ACTION TELL the mayor: we need protections against police surveillance Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
  Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development February 4, 2022 At the invitation of President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by David M. Driesen
In the general workplace case, NFIB v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 2:10 pm by Amy Howe
Texas Department of Public Safety (March 29): Whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against states, without their consent, under its constitutional war powers. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]