Search for: "In Re Baxter"
Results 201 - 220
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 10:32 am
Baxter and Kathryn M. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:33 pm
See In re Baxter Int'l, Inc., 698 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm
D.N.H. 2006); Baxter v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:52 am
Okanagan law firm Pushor Mitchell raised over $5000 for the Heart and Stroke Foundation through some fun Valentine’s Day events: a heart-healthy BBQ lunch, a silent re-gifting auction, a casual attire day, and 50/50 ticket sales. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
If Baxter's recusal leaves the Court without a four-vote majority, the Court may have to appoint a pro tem justice and then re-hear oral argument, unless the parties waive it. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Nowadays author’s rights are among the universally recognized human rights. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
We have a fabulous Boston Terrier named Baxter. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:00 pm
When the Federal Circuit denied the Request for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing en banc in In re Baxter, the court let stand its two decisions that affirmed conflicting rulings on the validity of the same patent. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:00 pm
When the Federal Circuit denied the Request for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing en banc in In re Baxter, the court let stand its two decisions that affirmed conflicting rulings on the validity of the same patent. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
Baxter Healthcare, 947 F. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:49 am
Baxter owns a patent. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:36 am
In In re Baxter International Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:59 pm
In re Baxter International (CAFC 2011-1073) precedential; en banc, per curiam In this matter, a patent held valid in litigation is still subject to reexamination. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Pfizer (femoral stem) Deposition1998-08-31 In re AMS Minnesota Penile Prosthesis Litigation Deposition1998-08-31 In re Guidant Implantable Defibrillators PLL Deposition1998-09-09 Suerth v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:15 am
Second, assuming the patent has been the subject of an unsuccessful PTAB challenge, and as demonstrated recently in the case of In re Baxter, there will a significant incentive to continue a reexamination attack. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
Baxter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm
Baxter, if you think you’re seeing mermaids and sea monsters, you’ve been submerged too long! [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
Yet, this is exactly what happened in In re Baxter International decided a couple of months ago by the CAFC. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The following case is published below with my own commentary added in the blue fields. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
No matter how long I wait I know that they’re in there. [read post]
