Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc." Results 201 - 220 of 986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 12:46 pm by Alex Oliveira
This opinion is unfortunately the going to re-shape PIP reimbursements for massage therapists performing physical therapy modalities unless the other District courts of appeal receive similar cases and issue contradictory rulings. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ceballos, the Supreme Court upheld the power of non-academic government employers to regulate their employees' speech that is pursuant to their employment duties. 547 U.S. 410, 421 (2006). [read post]
27 May 2020, 10:51 am by Tom Smith
If they want a driver, security courtesy of the Federal Marshall's service, a nice office to work in, four clerks to pick their dry cleaning and dinner, etc., they have to stay in the job As jobs go, it's not super demanding, especially if they're willing to let the clerks do their research and draft opinions. [read post]
23 May 2020, 12:02 pm by bhorton
The Supreme Court has said, in an 8-1 opinion, it will not open up new “uncovered” zones of speech. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 5:54 pm by Russell Knight
” In Re Marriage of Tietz, 605 NE 2d 670 Ill Appellate Court, 4th Dist. 1992. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
  That Supreme Court case was an ADEA (age discrimination) case. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 7:29 am by Russell Knight
There is one exception to this hearsay rule in regards to children’s opinions. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm by Kandace Watson
Barnhill, 212 A.2d 805, 808 (Del. 2019). [2] See, e.g., In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:45 pm by Andy Taylor
  This, in our opinion, is a positive move by the court. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:52 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Law enforcement does not get to constantly warrantlessly search everybody’s email accounts, cloud storage accounts, etc. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 4:20 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Indeed, a United States Supreme Court majority opinion predicted that Title VII, which contains the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, would preempt state law, thereby absolving employers that complied with Title VII from liability for any fetal injury. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
The PDE5i medications (sildenafil, tadalafil, etc.) have multiple indications, but they are perhaps best known for their ability to induce penile erections, which in some situations can be a very useful outcome. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:21 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
The Vermont Supreme Court decided it would start 2020 with a bang, with an opinion about jurisdiction in CHINS cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
The official website of the Guangdong Court said that the Supreme People's Court of Guangdong Province had rejected an appeal against the fine. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
  As the Illinois Supreme Court explained in an 1872 case, Walsh v. [read post]
How Might a Blood or Urine Test Negative for Drugs be Fobbed Off as Consistent with the DRE’s Opinion? [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
However, as to that detour, see below concerning “Reference” procedure.This delay and retroactivity is unacceptable by any measure, and the Supreme Court of Canada, at my behest along with Ariel Katz and Prof. [read post]