Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 201 - 220
of 13,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2012, 3:11 pm
If you've read Practical Paralegalism for a while, you know that I view Fridays as not just business casual, but "business nightgown", i.e. super comfortable, feel like you're wearin' your pjs style (unless there are court-related activities, and then scratch this whole opening sentence, and dig out a suit and maybe your long lost pantyhose). [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 10:02 pm
It has one or two redeeming features (i.e., when civility actually helps to get things done), which are generally outweighed by its abuses and sheer silliness. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
You're not going to win that one. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:02 am
(citingIn re Kerkhoven , 626 F.2d 846, 850 (CCPA 1980) andIn re Sussman , 136 F.2d 715, 718 (CCPA1943).We agree with the Examiner that these applied references evince a prima facie case of obviousness for claim 1.Appellants’ nonobviousness position is premised on their contentionthat while “some healing effects wouldbe expected through the use of theindividual ingredients,”i.e., curcumin and nitroglycerin, the claimedinvention exhibits superior and… [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:20 am
This is not an ipsissimis verbis test,i.e., identity of terminology is not required. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:43 am
All three of them were residing in group facilities (i.e., nursing homes and assisted living centers). [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:55 pm
However, in a significant indication of the panel's sentiments on its opinion, it urged plaintiffs, including several trade unions and pharmacies, to request en banc review (apparently so the en banc court could do what a panel cannot, i.e., overturn prior precedent). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Continue reading "BREAKING NEWS: SCOTUS Opinion in re Bilsiki is out! [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
If you’re eager to gaining operational efficiency sooner rather than later, you might be interested in this. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm
(That decision was In re: Hulu on August 2, 2021.) [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 8:27 am
A domestic violence conviction can have significant negative repercussions on your immigration status, resulting in your deportation, denial of re-entry into the United States, or exclusion from naturalization (i.e., the process of becoming a U.S. citizen). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:07 am
They went through a phase of deciding that, because forfeiture was unlikely, (i.e. that relief would be granted), there was no breach. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:07 am
They went through a phase of deciding that, because forfeiture was unlikely, (i.e. that relief would be granted), there was no breach. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Yesterday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released a published opinion (In Re Bowen) in an original mandamus proceeding. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:56 am
I'm presenting Saturday morning (i.e., today) on one of two "Green" panels... [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:31 am
” Later, the same document concludes that the question presented—i.e., the viability of Kessler—“does not have practical importance. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:50 am
Image by Oberholster Venita from Pixabay Today we’re going back to the basics and learning how a plaintiff must prove a sex discrimination claim based on circumstantial (i.e., the defendant doesn’t concede, “I fired you because you’re a woman. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:17 am
In Re: Anna Christie [2013] UKUT 327 (LC), the Upper Tribunal was faced with an application for permission to appeal out of time. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:00 am
All you want them to do is to live up to their responsibilities; i.e. pay you the price they agreed to, but they don't, haven't, and won't. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
In a survey conducted last Thursday (8th March) at the annual Civitas Sixth Form Conference on the European Union, 68% of 16-18 year olds revealed that they would vote against ‘a Constitutional treaty that gives the EU legal personality' (i.e. the power to make international agreements by itself, or on behalf of member states). [read post]
