Search for: "MERRELL"
Results 201 - 220
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), detailed how courts deal with polygraph tests as scientific evidence, since neither the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Yesterday, with my good buddies Casey Sipe and Jessica Miller-Merrell from Blogging4Jobs.com, I presented a webinar on the interplay between the Family and Medical Leave Act, state workers’ compensation laws, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 523 A.2d 374 (Pa. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:43 am
Merrell Co., 174 So. 2d 736, 738-39 (Fla. 1965); Estate of Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
Merrell Dow Pharma., Inc., 791 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
Merrell Nat’l Labs., 711 F.2d 1510, 1513-15 (11th Cir. 1983) (finding a verdict to be an impermissible compromise and remanding for a new trial when a jury’s award was inadequate, liability was strongly contested, and the jurors made clear that they could not reach agreement on liability). [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
As the Court recognized in its 1986 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and granted BNSF’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, in which the Supreme Court established the standards for the use of expert and scientific evidence in federal courts. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 599 (1993) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (‘‘the various briefs filed in this case … deal with definitions of scientific knowledge, scientific method, scientific validity, and peer review—in short, matters far afield from the expertise of judges’’); Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:55 pm
”In the Sun-Times article, the statistical basis for Jim Merrell's position was broken down. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals in 1993, creating a new “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony in federal court, interested parties vigorously debated whether Daubert was a lax rule that would favor the admissibility of expert testimony, or a strict rule that would lead to the exclusion of a great deal of previously admissible expert evidence. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:09 am
Also, under Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Rule 702, Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:24 am
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593-94 (1993). [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:12 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
“For the rational study of the law the blackletter man may be the man of the present, but the man of the future is the man of statistics and the master of economics. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
The Havner Hurdle Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
