Search for: "Matter of Said v Said"
Results 201 - 220
of 30,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:58 am
The Supreme Court said this in Garcetti v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am
Alberta’s Municipal Affairs Minister suggested the changes are nothing to worry about—the province won’t get involved in municipal matters without “a darn good reason. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
As we shall see, this latter mandate is easier to articulate than it is to apply in real-world circumstances.We now turn to more specific issues that arise in the encampment setting.As a general matter, when government (including public university administrators) regulate speech-related activities in physical areas that have been generally open for expressive purposes, government must, as just noted, do so in a content- and viewpoint-neutral way, that is, in a way that is not focused on… [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:28 pm
UC must be “as flexible as it can” in matters of free speech, he said, but must act in cases in which student learning and expression are blocked, university functions disrupted and safety threatened. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:45 pm
UC President Michael V. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:18 am
In Kluge v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 am
In the County Court, Recorder Deal KC said that the language used in the correspondence dismissing Mr Ghaoui’s request “could be described as censorious. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm
When the jury returned, the trial court said to them: So, ladies and gentlemen, the defendant in this particular matter has not testified. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Does it matter? [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:47 am
See Lowery v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Accordingly it was withdrawn from the scheme, with the result that three of the objectors decided not to pursue the matter [3]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
First, as is true in the debate over whether the N-word can ever be uttered in classrooms (in K-12 or higher ed) around the country, there is, at least as a logical matter, a distinction between “using” an epithet against someone and simply referring to one by vocalizing the term (such as one might when one relevantly quotes what someone else has said). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Palkon et. al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm
While the Court refused to do so, Justices Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett said they were reserving judgment on the issue while the USSC studied the matter. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
The issue is clear enough, as a matter of law and norm, and the protection of a rightly perceived to be fundamental premise of inter-State relations--"'This is not a leftist thing, or a right-wing thing,' said José Miguel Vivanco, a Chilean lawyer and fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'It’s a fundamental principle that has been breached and deserves strong condemnation from the international community to make sure this isn’t going to… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:41 am
And in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
