Search for: "Mendez v. Mendez"
Results 201 - 220
of 397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
McMiller v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
In Marrero-Mendez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In Bond v Lichtenstein (pdf), decided July 15, 2014, Justice Mendez granted a mother summary judgment in lieu of complaint under C.P.L.R. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
” Examination Before Trial of Gerald Markowitz, in Mendez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
”One exception to the general rule: In Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612 the Appellate Division held that as long as the termination of a probationer appointed to a position in the classified service is effected within a reasonable time after the end of his or her maximum period of probation, such as set to coincide with the end of the next payroll period, he or she does not attain tenure by estoppel or acquisition notwithstanding his or her continuation on the payroll. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Such was the case in Mallon v Parness, 167 A.D.2d 614. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
In Valdez v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
Korematsu v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:45 am
Plaintiff Sylvia Mendez (in Mendez v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:40 am
Louis V. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Delay in terminating an employee 2014 NY Slip Op 00265, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612, the Appellate Division held that retaining Mendez, a probationary employee, on the payroll after the maximum period of his probation until the end of payroll period for administrative convenience did not result in his attaining tenure in the position. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Editor’s Note: The contractors complained to the 5th Circuit that Judge Vance relied on its unpublished opinion in a similar case: Mendez v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:52 am
One case, Gupta v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:37 pm
Mendez and People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:59 pm
Mendez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:32 am
Denying in part the employer’s motion to dismiss, the court also allowed the employee’s interference with the right to take pregnancy leave claim to advance; however, her failure to accommodate claim was dismissed (Graves v Pau Hana Group, LLC dba KJL Fasteners, November 8, 2013, Mendez, J). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
Mendez, 68 AD3d 662 [2009]; People v. [read post]
