Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 201 - 220 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2014, 10:31 am by SJM
The ECtHR Chamber has delivered its decision in McDonald v UK. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Feels a bit like giving in, though.Anyway: Transcript of oral argument, for those who prefer not to read secondhand postmortems.Supreme Court post-argument discussion at AU's Washington College of Law: Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 11:09 am by Lyle Denniston
” These exchanges occurred Wednesday as the Court heard the case of Wood v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
Listed for two days from this morning in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The reason the school owes Pupil C a non-delegable duty of care, according to Lady Hale, is because it has undertaken to teach her: “[T]hat responsibility is not discharged simply by choosing apparently competent people to do it. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The reason the school owes Pupil C a non-delegable duty of care, according to Lady Hale, is because it has undertaken to teach her: “[T]hat responsibility is not discharged simply by choosing apparently competent people to do it. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am by Laura Coogan
  He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The notion that joint or common owners of property cannot be charged with larceny is firmly rooted in common law as held in People v Zinke. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
I am not sure how many people actually have the long view over time, or the wider view internationally. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:07 pm
On May 3, 2013, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion awarding appellate attorney's fees and costs against the City & County of Honolulu in the amount of $41,192.00 in attorney's fees and $343.00 in costs in Kaleikini v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:07 pm
On May 3, 2013, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion awarding appellate attorney's fees and costs against the City & County of Honolulu in the amount of $41,192.00 in attorney's fees and $343.00 in costs in Kaleikini v. [read post]