Search for: "Perry v. Littles " Results 201 - 220 of 455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Thus, for diseases for which the causes are largely unknown, such as most birth defects, a differential etiology is of little benefit. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"The majority takes comfort in the lack of evidence of 'an epidemic of unnecessary minor-offense arrests.' But the relatively small number of published cases dealing with such arrests proves little and should provide little solace. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
  Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:55 am by Eoin Daly
More recently, in Van Orden v Perry [2005], a narrow conservative majority of the Supreme Court held that the display of the ten commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol did not violate the establishment clause, primarily on the basis of the historical, secular significance of the Ten Commandments in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm by David Oscar Markus
A great majority of prosecutions are resolved with guilty pleas, and more vigorous judicial supervision of how the pleas are reached would have a broad practical impact.The court will also consider the use of eyewitness evidence, in Perry v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:06 pm
"Indefensible," his book about the criminal justice system, will be published in June by Little, Brown & Company. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Parties are less likely to be thinking of legality at time of creation v. other types of creativity and likely to know very little about other bands’ practices. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
If you have a fairly tapered waist (the “V” shape), buy an “athletic” cut shirt, otherwise you will look ridiculous. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
There were no executions that year.Yet that fact had little to do with the pandemic. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:53 pm by emagraken
Zhu, 2013 BCCA 352, 366 D.L.R. (4th) 443, Madam Justice Newbury for the Court adopted this description from Perry v. [read post]