Search for: "Research Laboratories v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
” Most of the surface waters of the United States will fail the generic E. coli standard either persistently, predictably during certain times of the year or intermittently. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
These individuals and entities include universities, independent inventors, research & development companies, and federal laboratories. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Abbott Laboratories upheld the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
The experiment was conducted in a federal agency facility, Environmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:06 am
In the United States, one judge who has been perhaps the most exposed to the tobacco documents is United States District Court Judge Gladys Kessler. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:01 am
Because of its patents, Myriad has the authority to stop all research on the genes and is the only company in the United States that can provide diagnostic testing for mutations on the genes, and thus can charge exorbitant amounts for these tests (currently over $4000 per patient). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Hansen spoke on behalf of the petitioners; General Verrilli on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae; Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:00 pm
United States, 54 App. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:40 am
By Dennis Crouch Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:29 am
On April 15th, there is a chance for the United States Supreme Court to correct this genetic injustice and remove the limitations to our DNA. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Abbott Laboratories, C.A. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
