Search for: "Research in Motion Ltd"
Results 201 - 220
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2012, 8:14 pm
Patent Nos. 6,650,327 (the ‘327 patent), 6,816,145 (the ‘145 patent), and 5,717,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San… [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:26 am
Legal Research & Writing (www.QuestionOfLaw.net), she assists attorneys with all their legal research and writing needs, including preparing and arguing appeals and drafting substantive motions and trial memoranda. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 pm
Patent Nos. 5,926,636 (the ‘636 patent), 5,929,655 (the ‘655 patent), 6,208,879 (the ‘879 patent), and 6,456,841 (the ‘841 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG… [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
-James Balsillie, Research in Motion Ltd. $5.2 million. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
District Judge Josephine Tucker in Los Angeles denied five motions on Aug. 1 to dismiss a $2.2 billion lawsuit filed by Solid Oak Software Inc. against Haier Group Corp., a computer manufacturer, and two software firms backed by the Chinese government, Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering Ltd. and Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy Ltd. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 the Supreme Court commented just a few weeks ago that “Valuable as it is, the motion to strike is a tool that must be used with care. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Ltd. et al. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:56 pm
The complaint alleges that the proposed respondents, Research in Motion, Ltd. of Canada, and Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas (collectively, “RIM”) unlawfully import into the United States, sell for importation, and/or sell within the United States after importation certain wireless communication system server software, wireless handheld devices and battery packs which allegedly infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:25 pm
The complaint alleges that Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”) and Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada and Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas (the latter two parties, collectively, “RIM”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain devices for mobile data communication that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:34 pm
Research in Motion Ltd., Nos. 2012-1679, 2013-1123 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:04 am
In February 2011, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granted Nintendo’s motion. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:15 pm
TheCourt thus upheld the alien-venue rule and held that theCanadian corporation defendant in that case, BrunetteMachine Works, Ltd., could not rely on § 1400(b) as a“shield” against suit in a particular district. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
October 24, 2023 - 11 AM: Vision Research, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:33 am
LTD. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
Bdh.; Lenovo Group Ltd.; Lenovo (US), Inc.; Lenovo (Beijing) Ltd.; International Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Lenovo (Huiyang) Electronic Industrial Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd.; PNY Technologies, Inc.; Research in Motion, Ltd.; Research in Motion Corporation; Sony Corporation; Sony Corporation of America; Sony Ericsson… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:28 pm
B&R Typical Case 7: Jiangsu Taihu Boiler Co., Ltd. and PT. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm
International Trade Commission’s Judge Thomas Pender issued a notice in the patent infringement battle brought by Eastman Kodak against Apple, Inc. and Research In Motion, Ltd. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm
International Trade Commission’s Judge Thomas Pender issued a notice in the patent infringement battle brought by Eastman Kodak against Apple, Inc. and Research In Motion, Ltd. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Also in November, the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa handed down judgment in Beyond Platinum (Pty) Ltd v Ellies Electronics (Pty) Ltd [2020]. [read post]
