Search for: "State v. Kind" Results 201 - 220 of 21,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2024, 8:14 am by Tobin Admin
He then stated that after processing the situation, he realized he might have “clipped the cow. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:49 am by Dan Bressler
To ensure that Natale’s participation did not violate New York State Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7(a), the “attorney-witness rule,” U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 This new rule is not supported by text, history, or precedent of any kind. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
State courts had been practicing judicial review for over a decade, and before that a kind of proto-judicial review existed for decades in the colonies--as work by legal historians such as (my former colleagues) Barbara Black and Philip Hamburger, as well as (my law school classmate) Mary Bilder has shown. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 10:14 am by Ralf Michaels
Nevena Jevremovic (School of Law, University of Aberdeen) then presented their work titled ‘Private International Law and the Race to the Bottom in Labour Standards: The Case of Begum v Maran’, discussed the recent Court of Appeal case, Begum v Maran. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Martin, Devisee of Fairfax (which produced the decision reversed in Martin v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm by Joy
’ […]” It’s crucial to understand that this kind of allegation, without supporting evidence, is usually not enough to sustain a will challenge. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Derek T. Muller
Does the varied experience of district v. appellate or state v. federal offer enough potential value, or is the incremental benefit much smaller after having worked in a judicial chambers? [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Derek T. Muller
Does the varied experience of district v. appellate or state v. federal offer enough potential value, or is the incremental benefit much smaller after having worked in a judicial chambers? [read post]