Search for: "State v. Payne"
Results 201 - 220
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
Helmerich & Payne International, a case involving pleading standards for expropriation cases against foreign governments filed in U.S. courts, and SCA Hygiene Products v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
PEDF told governments to use the test of Payne v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
See Spence, Payne, Masington & Grossman, P.A. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm
Payne, D. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Anne Payne v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 7:10 pm
" United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm
On 19 December 2019, Warby J gave Judgment in the case of Triplark Limited v Northwood Hall (Freehold) Limited (2) Philip Whale (3) David Wismayer [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:09 am
In Payne v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Defendants have asserted a counterclaim for account stated. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am
Payne, Wood & Littlejohn, 197 A.D.2d 664, 666 (2d Dept. 1993). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:43 pm
Prince) John Britton Payne, Foley & Lardner LLP Paddy Johnson, founding editor of Art Fag City David A. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court precedent set in Lockhard v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 6:26 pm
As the Sixth Circuit demonstrated in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
However, he did not find that there had been any deprivation of that possession by the State. [read post]
