Search for: "U. S. v. King" Results 201 - 220 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2017, 1:46 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Leave it to lawyers to see an obscure, narrow, and disfavored legal theory and then try to drive a mack f**king truck through it like it's the next great revelation.To what might I refer? [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Supreme Court –Kings County, New York:  People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Robert Welch, that “[u]nder the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:02 pm by Susan Brenner
One of the conditions was that “[u]pon reasonable suspicion, as ascertained by the Probation and Parole Officer,” Swearingen’s Upon person, vehicle, and/or residence” could be “searched at any time, day or night, without a warrant by a probation/parole officer . . . or a Law Enforcement Officer (at the direction of the probation/parole/ISP officer). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am by Peter Margulies
” As the Court has said repeatedly, most recently in 2015’s King v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
Co., 14 Misc 3d 135[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 50179[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]; Dan Med., P.C. v New York Cent. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm by Big Tent Democrat
A Living Constitution; Scalia's Nonsense on Originalism,Dred Scott,Originalism and A Living Constitution, Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Marissa Miller
Justice Sotomayor was also the subject of a feature by Ian Shapira of The Washington Post, who discusses the Justice’s involvement in her new neighborhood, Washington’s U Street corridor. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]