Search for: "U. S. v. May"
Results 201 - 220
of 7,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 2:50 am
" Without further comment, here is Breytman v Schechter ; 2011 NY Slip Op 51375(U) ; Supreme Court, Kings County Schack, J. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:47 am
Cross-posted on http://piracy-law.com/2014/02/15/dismissal-of-charges-in-u-s-v-ali/Filed under: IntLawGrrls Tagged: Facilitation of Piracy, Milena Sterio, piracy, universal jurisdiction [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
On May 10, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter Strategic Technologies PTE, Ltd. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Guido, 586 U. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Walker, 533 U. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:25 pm
., Inc. v GEICO Gen. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:15 am
S. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:15 am
S. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:19 am
The ball is in Chief Justice Roberts's Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:42 am
It may be that the statutory scheme’s focus on regulating the actions of collective organizations, and the case law’s focus on ensuring that such organizations do not devolve into “instruments of oppression and extortion” (Vigneux v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
S. ___ (2011). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:25 am
S. 63, 68−70 (2010); First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Baker, 554 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:34 am
North Dakota, 504 U. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”Turning to DOE’s termination of Teacher’s employment, the Appellate Division, citing Brown v City of New York, 280 AD2d 368, observed that it is well established that a "probationary employee may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that [the] dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:12 am
Mock; 2011 NY Slip Op 31540(U) ;May 26, 2011; Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 20409/10 ;Judge: Antonio I. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:22 pm
S. 419, 141 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
At that point, the whole entirety of Borak may be in jeopardy [read post]
