Search for: "U.S. Steel Group v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am by Schachtman
Wells had no protocol, no pre-stated commitment to which years in the dataset he would use, and no pre-stated statistical analysis plan. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm by Brett M. Kavanaugh
As Barron points out, presidents have the exclusive, preclusive authority (and duty) to repel attacks on the United States and on U.S. persons and property, even without specific congressional authorization. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
In the ensuing decades, however, the federal courts, including the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Yet, as its critics argue, this is still a Marxist approach to property and its relationship to individuals and collective ownership.[20] The process has not been without deep division within the Chinese Communist Party at times, as different groups advance distinct visions of the future course of development of Marxi [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am by Rachel Margolis
When Corporations Are the Criminalizers Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have promoted private-sector investment in Central America on the theory that it will improve standards of living and stem the flow of migrants to the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection, February 26, 2010 United Parcel Service has agreed to pay a $53,931 civil penalty to U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Groups like the ironically entitled Alliance Defending Freedom see Griswold v. [read post]