Search for: "US v. Boss"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
The dispute in Eureka E.C Oxenham & Cy Ltd V Oxenham A E & Anor (2020 SCJ 92) centred on whether the respondent could use his name and signature “Alexander Oxenham” and “A. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
The case of Murray v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court decision Hague v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:34 am
that what we have here is coup v. coup. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
The statutes have previously been used to hold foreign officials accountable for harms that occurred abroad, as in Filartiga v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 5:14 am
The future is everything that lies ahead of us. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Erlandsson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:01 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Lockett v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:32 pm
Valdivia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am
Join us each week as your hosts simplify the absurd amount of Mueller news and wrap it up into informative, hilarious bites. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:14 am
” “A firm that is asked to act as liquidator for a bust company faces a difficult balancing act, explains the boss of a leading accounting firm. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 9:12 am
And actually the case at that time was called Lynch v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
The decision in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Case C‑311/18 (aka Schrems II), has brought into question whether any transfers to the US can be valid, and has opened up the Binding Corporate Rules regime, which is used by some of the world’s biggest multinational groups, to challenge. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
This Kat has sufficiency (of mice) objectionsWelcome to the latest IPKat roundup, which should especially cheer fans of patent news and views.PatentsKodak's most recent endeavours, by way of an announced pivot to generic pharmaceutical manufacturing thanks to a US government COVID-response loan, swiftly followed by an insider trading investigation which put the loan on hold, drew comment from PermaKat Neil Wilkof.In news from Australia, GuestKat Rose Hughes reported on the confirmation… [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm
Kat Friend Xi Lin provided her comments on Jin Yong v. [read post]
