Search for: "Watt v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
State, 659 So.2d 235, 238 (Florida Supreme Court 1995); Goudy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm by Cleve Clinton
Truth and Illusion in the Fracking DebateFrac(k)ing, Parr v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
United States, a major ruling on military commissions. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
See Twombly, 550 U.S. at 563 ('[O]nce a claim has been stated adequately, it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.'); McZeal v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012, Boasberg,… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:35 am by Legal Beagle
But, assuming that it was open to me to refuse to hear Miss Watts or to grant the motion irrespective of its merits, I decided that it was entirely inappropriate for me to do so andto the extent that my hearing Miss Watts required me to exercise my powers under rule 2.1, I did so. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:32 am by Alex R. McQuade
In Sunday’s Foreign Policy Essay, Stephen Watts analyzed a competing risks approach to security sector assistance for fragile states. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am by Allison Trzop
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]