Search for: "X-L-Co., Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Bankruptcy Judge Terrence L. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Household Int’l, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
Co., 133 S. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:23 am
Int’l Paper Co., 710 So. 2d 666, 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:38 pm
See , e.g., Anthony’s Pizza & Pasta Int’l, Inc., 95 U.S.P.Q.2d 1271, at *8(T.T.A.B. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
It would seem that the dominant jurisdiction doctrine cannot furnish an answer - and would not provide a basis for abatement - because the two fora do not have co-extensive authority under an arbitration agreement that makes some claims arbitrable but not others, - at least not in a scenario where both types of claims are present in the same dispute and are contemporaneously pursued, in the respective fora, but involve a common core of case-determinative facts. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Delta Int’l Mach. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
And the Second Circuit followed an analogous approach in Nat’l Advertising Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:27 am
Edward X. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Rothman, Sander Greenland, and Tim L. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
In BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Brian L. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
L. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Congress promises a state $X of funding to be used for highway construction for each of the next three years. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:49 am
….Jon L. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App'x 819, 820-21 (2d Cir. 2010) (applying Arizona law); Gove v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Its legislative authority is divided between a Bundesrat, which represents the German states (Länder) with relatively constrained authority. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
See In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1209, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1691 (Fed. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
”[x] Under the GLBA, financial institutions, in actions brought by the Department of Justice only (there is no private right of action under GLBA), can be fined up to $100,000 for each violation, and directors and officers of financial institutions could be held personally liable for civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation. [read post]
