Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 2181 - 2200 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 6:36 am
  The DSM-V has not been adopted, nor is there any agreement that the following diagnosis should be added. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
We agree that the evidence supports the state court's factual findings." [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
 That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:44 pm by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Our Miami injury lawyers understand how to build a strong case, including the use of expert witnesses, as and when needed. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:15 am
The lead case is Commissioner of Insurance v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm by Vercammen Law
During the drive, Sergeant Ade testified that he continued to "smell the . . . strong odor of an alcoholic beverage" and noted that defendant was making "incoherent statements. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm by Unknown
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Health Insurance; Medicare-Like Rates; Employee Welfare) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMatter of White v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:46 pm
Two of those matters have been relisted at least twice indicating a strong cert grant possibility on these or related claims. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 5:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  It requires a strong understanding of medicine, massive record discovery, use of specialist medical experts, depositions of physicians, and a contest with an extremely well trained defense bar. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:38 am by Wage & Hour Blogger
  However, the state minimum wage requirements in each of the wage orders do apply, and so the California Supreme Court’s new Mendiola v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
While an earlier version of the case was pending before the Supreme Court in 2005, President Bush issued a memorandum stating he would meet the treaty obligations by “having state courts give effect” to the World Court ruling.But the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the command, ruling that the state’s limits on successive habeas applications took precedence.As the case Medellin v Texas made its way back to the high court last… [read post]