Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 5,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
Cody Tuma also stated that he lied to CCS's investigator. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
Coakley Harris v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Supreme Court cast doubt on the fees in another Illinois case, Harris v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Moreover, the claims were not barred by the statute of limitations, which was tolled by both executive order (9 NYCRR 8.202.8), as extended, and the continuous representation doctrine (Murphy v Harris, 210 AD3d 410, 411 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:07 am
Meyer 4(2), pp. 91–112 Reconstructing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to More Effectively Alleviate Food Insecurity in the United States Craig Gundersen, Brent Kreider, John V. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
OpinionsEntergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
On Tuesday, the Court accepted an appeal in Harris v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Simon Harris agreed, pointing his speech in the same direction. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
But not all reforms are made impossible; moreover, the most effective way to change individual constitutional doctrines is not Article V amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 3:44 pm
Law): United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
The Democrats still control the Senate (51-D v 46-R) and downtown at White House. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
