Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 3,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 1:38 am
” On this basis, the court concluded that the claimant’s alleged loss would have occurred in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Trainmen v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Despite the long tradition of criticizing the courts in the United States for asserting legislative and culturally based social engineering authority in the service of one or another ideological or cultural program, the reality appears to be the opposite, Courts tend to serve as a conservative rather than an instrumental force iun society. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm
The United States Constitution, Article 5 states, “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
Mediatech did this at the request of a United Kingdom company which marketed them through an internet site. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Schepers, who became deaf and daft, and fantasized and testified to conversations with people, long dead, who could not contradict him. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:34 am
United States, No. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:34 pm
Procedural HistoryAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:33 pm
Not surprisingly, that sounds like a great idea to the United States’ foremost practitioner of selective enforcement, the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
EmulexAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm
Of that total, $48,600 can be donated to a federal candidate or that candidate’s organization, and $74,600 can go to non-candidate groups — national and state party committees, and non-party committees — so long as no more than $48,600 of that amount goes to state parties or non-candidate committees. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]
