Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 2201 - 2220
of 16,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2022, 10:03 am
By Mark S. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021).Tarun Khaitan The central claim that Professors Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric make in their provocative new book ‘Power to the People’ is that populism is only contingently in conflict with constitutionalism. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
[FN1] Section 9.13 (a) of the 2007-2011 CBA set forth the contribution rates discussed above, providing that "[t]he State agrees to pay 90 percent of the cost of individual coverage and 75 percent of the cost of dependent coverage toward the hospital/medical/mental health and substance abuse components provided under the Empire Plan. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
[FN1] Section 9.13 (a) of the 2007-2011 CBA set forth the contribution rates discussed above, providing that "[t]he State agrees to pay 90 percent of the cost of individual coverage and 75 percent of the cost of dependent coverage toward the hospital/medical/mental health and substance abuse components provided under the Empire Plan. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:35 am
In solidarity, Mark Aaronson Alice Armitage Alina Ball Richard Boswell Betsy Candler Veena Dubal Nira Geevargis Brittany Glidden Miye Goishi James Higa Juan Carlos Ibarra Rory Little Shauna Marshall Stefano Moscato Karen Musalo Christine Natoli Ascanio Piomelli Gail Silverstein Linh Spencer If this doesn’t restore your confidence in the efficacy of a law school education for the future lawyers of America, what will? [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:07 am
If they believe he’s guilty, that’s what matters. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Marks like “Trump Too Small” previously refused under Section 2(c) may also now be refused registration under the USPTO’s Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) rules on the ground they are merely informational or expressive matter that fails to function as a mark. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Their repeated message is: specifics matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
Attorney Mark [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 2:19 pm
You can't meet all these people in one day. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
What Is AI and Why Does It Matter for National Security? [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:29 am
Her segment begins at roughly the 16:58 mark. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
It matters. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:19 am
The examiner stated it did not matter that Elster intended the mark to serve as “political commentary” because “there is no statutory or ‘case law carve[] out’ for ‘political commentary. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:11 am
“NRA Wants Dorsey & Whitney DQ’d From Ad Agency Suit” — “The NRA claimed in a motion Monday that a privilege log recently revealed that Dorsey & Whitney LLP worked briefly with Virginia lawyer Mark Dycio, who had advised the association on matters relevant to the case. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
A de-identification period spanning a matter of weeks hardly constitutes evidence of any bad intent on Telebrands’ part. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
The statute leaves the PTO no discretion to exempt trademarks that advance parody, criticism, commentary on matters of public importance, artistic transformation, or any other First Amendment interests. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
’”[8] The Court then enticingly offered that “[i]t may be that a substantial number of section 2(c)’s applications would be unconstitutional,” because “[t]he statute leaves the PTO no discretion to exempt trademarks that advance parody, criticism, commentary on matters of public importance, artistic transformation, or any other First Amendment interests. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
Ct. 2294 (2019), the Court considered another provision of section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which directed the PTO to deny registration of marks that “consist[] of or comprise[] immoral . . . or scandalous matter,” § 1052(a). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:49 am
TTABlogger comment: FWIW, I don't think much of that Waylon Jennings song. [read post]
