Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 2221 - 2240
of 7,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2014, 3:43 am
[W]e find that the public would clearly perceive the term NO SHIT, both in meaning and pronunciation, when presented with the proposed mark NO $#! [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:12 am
She has applied to register the mark CRAFT BREW ATTORNEY for legal services (Serial No. 86504533), relying on Section 2(f). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 11:47 am
In re Petering, 301 F.2d 681 (C.C.P.A. 1962), decided by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (the predecessor of the Federal Circuit) in 1962, provides an example in which the court holds that prior art disclosing a genus of 20 chemical compounds anticipated a species falling within that genus. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:18 am
It's this computer that we're concerned with. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:21 pm
This post is co-authored by Antoinette F. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
Pour ces confrères, c’est un choix, conforme à la devise des avocats : les défendre tous. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:06 am
Burnette, 698 F.2d 1038, 1049 (9th Cir. 1983) ("[W]e hold that once an item in an individual's possession has been lawfully seized and searched, subsequent searches of that item, so long as it remains in the legitimate uninterrupted possession of the police, may be conducted without a warrant. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:15 pm
e konulmu? [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 31, 123 S.Ct. 366, 154 L.Ed.2d 368 (2002); see also In re Arunachalam, 812 F.3d 290, 292 (3d Cir. 2016) (per curiam). [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
Re: FRE 404(b): (Reverses panel) "[W]e cannot say that the district court . . . . erred in determining that the stories in Curtin's possession contained relevant evidence of Curtin's intent. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:21 pm
Gonzales, 456 F.3d 88 (3d Cir. 2006). [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:49 pm
The availability of e-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
[5] In re Grand Jury, 23 F.4th 1088 (9th Cir. 2021) [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) : À la lumière de R. c. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
à lire sur le blog German IP, un article sur l'exigence de traduction des brevets européens après opposition, qui subsiste en Allemagne pour les brevets délivrés avant l'entrée en vigueur de l'accord de Londres. le blog de Pierre Breese donne accès à une enquête en ligne de l'APEB destinée à analyser les perceptions des acteurs de partenariat université / entreprise. sur le site… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
2 de la Loi sur la transparence et l’éthique en matière de lobbyisme) — interprétation de l’article 5 paragraphe 2 de la Loi sur la transparence et l’éthique en matière de lobbyisme — interprétation de l’article 25 de la Loi sur la transparence et l’éthique en matière de lobbyisme. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
L'administration d'environ 0,15 mg par kg et par jour faisait l'objet de la revendication 8 telle que déposée, laquelle se référait à chacune des revendications 1, 2, 3, 4 ou 5. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Expert Discovery Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.3(e)(6) provides that a party may discover all documents reviewed by an opposing expert, and Rule 194.2(f)(4) applies that same rule to a party’s employees who serve as experts. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Expert Discovery Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.3(e)(6) provides that a party may discover all documents reviewed by an opposing expert, and Rule 194.2(f)(4) applies that same rule to a party’s employees who serve as experts. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
This, says Arris, creates a risk that Cable One will cease purchasing Arris' CMTS and E-MTA products for its VoIP operations. [read post]
