Search for: "State v. English"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2011, 10:04 am
” This principle was then fleshed out in Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 : …the courts and Parliament are both astute to recognise their respective constitutional roles. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
In Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSOP) v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:25 pm
The judgment was against Middle East Online Limited, a company responsible for the publication of an online news website publishing news items in English and Arabic, and its editor ([2020] EWHC 1992 (QB)). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 12:37 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
It is appropriate to have regard to the case law of other contracting states. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
However, the recent Enfish v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm
The Court of Justice in its recent judgment of 6 October 2009, ICF v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
He will file an amicus brief on behalf of the State and Local Legal Center supporting the respondents in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:31 am
USDoJ and Winchell & Alexander v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
If English professional soccer is any guide, betting will become a pervasive part of the sports viewing experience across the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
The Economic Loss Rule and the Ability to Sue Design Professionals without a Contract A recent Maryland case, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:03 am
NTPC v Singer states that in the absence of an express choice, the substantive law of arbitration would be the same as that of the contract. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am
Under English law, each ship has proportionate fault for a collision. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am
Coverage of Monday’s oral argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
