Search for: "United States Liability Insurance Company"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 3,745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
By way of background, Side A D&O insurance (also referred to as “Coverage Part A”) covers non-indemnifiable (or “not indemnified,” depending on the wording) Loss[i], meaning that a Company (1) cannot advance or indemnify its directors and officers under its bylaws, or (2) is financially unable to do so (such as when a company files a proceeding under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
By way of background, Side A D&O insurance (also referred to as “Coverage Part A”) covers non-indemnifiable (or “not indemnified,” depending on the wording) Loss[i], meaning that a Company (1) cannot advance or indemnify its directors and officers under its bylaws, or (2) is financially unable to do so (such as when a company files a proceeding under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am
Porteadores argued that the ICA did not have jurisdiction over the dispute because it was a foreign company and because its corporate activities in the United States were governed by the North American Free Trade Agreement, not Arizona comp law. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
., the precious metals market, including gold) and the potential coverage implications these investigations and civil suits may have on insurers. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 7:12 am
It is a 2013, United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals case styled, The City of College Station, Texas v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
The world of directors and officers liability has long been characterized by rapid change. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
The insurance company appealed this decision. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:04 am
BoltNagi PC is one of the largest firms in the United States Virgin Islands and has experienced legal professionals to assist companies based in or seeking to relocate in the U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
It appears that TAFTA would require the United States, not just federal but also state and local laws to do something very like the E.U. harmonization principle, where the member states must bring their local laws into agreement with the European Union agreed law. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
[i] The Court re-affirmed these principles stating the following: The Copyright Act strikes “a balance between promoting the public interest in the encouragement and dissemination of works of the arts and intellect and obtaining a just reward for the creator… It seeks to ensure that an author will reap the benefits of his efforts, in order to incentivize the creation of new works. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Further, the District Court noted that Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 6:29 am
The Court granted summary judgment to the insurance company because the policy only covered accidents occurring in the United States and its territories and possessions, Puerto Rico and Canada. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
United States applies on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
As such, managers that rely on the CFTC’s Rule 4.13(a)(3) exemption from registration as a CPO, and managers that are registered CPOs operating under the CFTC Rule 4.7 exemption, remain prohibited from marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
Does this include an employee handbook statement that provides language to the effect, “ABC Company will investigate allegations of discrimination, harassment and other employee misconduct,” or is something more required? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:34 am
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:13 am
United States, in which the Court will consider how to allocate liability for restitution for victims of child pornography among the users of that pornography. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order was ambiguous as to what… [read post]
Read Carefully. The Insurance Coverage You Thought You Were Getting May Not Be The Coverage You Got.
26 Nov 2013, 10:39 am
2-BT needed liability insurance to cover its work, and found a provider, Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group, LLC (“PCIC”). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
Safeco Insurance Company of America. [read post]
