Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 2261 - 2280 of 7,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2008, 3:46 am
Smith of Hughes, Smith, and Yazinski, LLP of Claremont were present in an advisory role to the city. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 5:21 am
" Boardroom Climate ChangeMonday, July 16, 2007By Jeffrey Smith and Matthew Morreale"Jeffrey Smith, a partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore, and Matthew Morreale, an associate at the firm, write that the complexities of climate change decision-making may require new applications of the business judgment rule and will test the limits and scope of fiduciary duties of officers and directors as their responses to matters relating to climate change are… [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 3:43 pm
  Here’s what I (and  Adam Smith) said on the topic once before: Here’s Adam Smith on universities: The endowments of schools and colleges have necessarily diminished more or less the necessity of application in the teachers. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:54 am by Bart Torvik
The straight-up First Amendment claims seem frivolous under Smith, but the RFRA argument is worth debating, I think. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 10:11 pm
"This is an ongoing issue and something we examine from time to time," Smith says. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
Smith looks at questions regarding a jury of one's peers. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
” But how would the approval of Diclegis, on the strength of a full new drug application, somehow support his claim anew? [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Texas counters, in that case, that "once the rhetoric is put aside," the Smith case actually comes down to a routine application of controlling state law, not defiance of federal precedent. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
An applicant may express the algorithm in any understandable terms including as a mathematical formula, in prose, in a flow chart, or “in any other manner that provides sufficient structure. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith (1990), the Supreme Court held that religious objectors are generally not entitled to an exemption from religion-neutral, generally applicable laws. [read post]