Search for: "BRS "
Results 2261 - 2280
of 2,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 4:04 pm
KG [ German ], 17 July 2009 Belgium / BelgiquePress release concerning the activities of the Forrest Group in the Democratic Republic of Congo / Communiqué concernant les activités du groupe Forrest en RD Congo, 8 novembre 2005 Brazil / BrésilFinal statement by the Brazilian NCP on the complaint by the Central Union of Workers (CUT), on behalf of trade unions members of the Workers Network at BASF South America, against the company BASF… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Category: Civil Procedure By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleNeurorepair, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm
The outcome in Taurus/Orion/Spangenberg v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:26 pm
From Dynamic Drinkware v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
§ 147.131(c)(2)(i)(B); Appellants’ Br. at 26-27. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 2:50 pm
Trademark Swatch, Omega Contributory Infringement Theory of Willful Blindness (‘Knows or Has Reason to Know’) Admission of evidence of alleged infringement of non-plaintiff brands Omega elected to receive only statutory damages, which is an option the Lanham Act provides to address the problem facing a plaintiff unable to prove actual damages. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 10:03 pm
Category: 101 By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleIn re BRCA1- and BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer Test Patent Lit., No. 2014-1361, -1366 (Fed. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
’ Gov't Br. 10. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Rather, the legislator has given the deciding department discretion to decide [on that matter], according to its duties (Travaux préparatoires to the EPC 1973, Report on the second session of the Coordination Committee, May 15-19, 1972, document BR/209/72, point 67).It is undisputed that a first instance department which, in application of the EPC, has to take discretionary decisions has a margin of discretion which the Board of appeal has to respect. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am
Br. at 5-6 (tables). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
” Appellee’s Br. 45(emphasis added). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
The case pertains to the chemical compound D-mannitolN-(2-pyrazine)carbonyl-L-phenylalanine-Lleucineboronate, described in the textThe mannitolester of bortezomib acts as a “prodrug,” a compound thatconverts to or releases the active pharmaceutical ingredientupon administration to a patient. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
App. 2004) (internal citations omitted), reh'g denied.Johnston argues the trial court abused its discretion in qualifying Sergeant Schafer as an expert in `a field of study which is highly technical and therefore susceptible to misunderstanding, confusion, and error,’ (Appellant's Br. at 16), when Sergeant Schafer did not have the requisite training in statistics to form a valid opinion about the probability of an event. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
The Supreme Court hears argument tomorrow morning in the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am
” Appellant’s Br. 41. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Appellants’ Br. 31; J.A. 8338. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 2:08 pm
Unitrans Br. at 12, 14. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Appellant Br. 17, 25, 26. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
” Final Principal Br. for Vivendi at 75, No. 15-180 (filed Aug. 19, 2015). [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
