Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 2261 - 2280 of 32,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2008, 8:56 am
Cir. 1999), should be reconsidered and possibly overruled in any respect.The rehearing is scheduled for May 8, 2008, at 2:00 pm. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The appeal was directed against the decision of an Examining Division (ED) to refuse the application under consideration.Claims 1, 4 and 8 before the ED were drafted as follows (English translation):1. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 1:27 pm by Currin Compliance
However, if nonforfeiture compliance is under 54.7(a), then you have chosen to comply under 4221(n-1), and the statute does apply, and therefore these filing requirements do as well.Group Universal Life Insurance:The DFS filing guidance does not address group universal life insurance (GUL) at all. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The appellant lost in Ex parte WeinerKSR is mentioned:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methodsis likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The fact that SED's determination may have incidentally affected Abramoski’s ability to collect such benefits, said the Appellate Division, does not support her allegations of constitutional violations. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
Step 8: After attending your visa interview, the Consular officer will decide your case. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:22 am by David Leibowitz
 Check it out in Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:23 am
Today’s proposal is most notable for what it does not do: make any attempt to address investors’ need for standardized disclosure on climate change risk. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 1:33 pm
From the "freshness of academic legal discourse department" comes this Monday morning quiz in two parts: (1) how many results does the Westlaw JLR search ti(rethinking) come up with? [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:21 am by Brian Hall
In Dish Network, the Board concluded that the employer’s mandatory arbitration policy and agreement violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Writing for an 8-1 majority, Justice Kagen explains: The question is whether the debtor-licensor’s rejection of that contract deprives the licensee of its rights to use the trademark. [read post]