Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 2281 - 2300 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In another footnote, the court explains that the “defendant surmises in this video that his license plate was stolen by the deputy chief's child, but does not offer any basis for this accusation. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Alex, 2017 SCC 37 (36771) When ss. 258(1)(c) and 258(1)(g) are analyzed in accordance with modern principles of statutory interpretation, the Crown need not prove the demand was lawful in order to take advantage of statutory “shortcuts”; if sample taking is subjected to Charter scrutiny, and evidence of the breath test results found to be inadmissible by virtue of ss. 8 and 24(2), that ends the matter, and resort to the evidentiary shortcuts a non-issue. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
But theissue of differentiating claim 1’s scope from claim 24’sscope does not fit neatly into either category. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:43 am by Eric Goldman
” * Technical Amendment to DMCA Designated Agent Rule: The Copyright Office has issued a final rule amending 37 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
”[1] But human beings have always treated death as a matter of the greatest consequence. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The offer letter clearly states "How to accept this offer" and lists two requirements: (1) signing and returning the Modification Agreement by December 31, 2013 a [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:11 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The City sought these penalties against Carl’s Jr. for allegedly failing to pay 37 employees the applicable Los Angeles minimum wage rate of $10.50 per hour from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:08 am by David Y. Trevor
Lessons Learned The case illustrates the following key points: The duty of religious accommodation does not depend on the employer’s opinion of the merits of the employee’s religious belief. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:08 am by David Y. Trevor
Lessons Learned The case illustrates the following key points: The duty of religious accommodation does not depend on the employer’s opinion of the merits of the employee’s religious belief. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
  Those differences can be reduced (in this case at least) to two fundamental issues: (1) the way that facts are weighed and balanced; (2) the basic assumptions about the role of the investor in the face of norms that must be enforced. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
City of New York, 487 U.S. 1, 14, 108 S.Ct.2225, 101 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am by Jo Dale Carothers
§1052(e)(1), “a trademark cannot be registered if it is ‘merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive’ of goods. [read post]