Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 2:10 am
The judgment (DiCaprio v Oops!) [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:15 pm
(UKIP v FA's UKIPO registered lion)Afro Leo - a distinguished lionIt is this lion that will be courting English support on what Wikipedia describe as its “Eurosceptic and right-wing populist” views. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
Sure enough, along comes one in the English High Court straight away! [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:35 pm
The defendant denies having said in her native language the equivalent of what the interpreter attributes to her in English, and the court must then decide what to do.In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Accord Banks v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Duggan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:07 am
America departed from the English rule for the same reason we rebelled from English imperialism -- and for the same reason innovators do a world of good: the status quo (and its imitation) hinders realization of human potential. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
R. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Ontario v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:37 am
In a blow for rights-holders, the UK Supreme Court has today decided that ISPs should not bear the implementation costs for website blocking orders in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2018] UKSC 28. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:59 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
I hope law professors find such time, as English professors sometimes do.) [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
"... and it has been so since Old English. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
Here's the footnote: ‘Si le preneur est expulsé par le fait du prince, par une force majeure, ou par quelque autre cas fortuit, ou si l'héritage périt par un débordement, par un tremblement de terre, on autre événement, le bailleur,... [read post]
26 Nov 2004, 2:00 pm
After last month's two judgments on internet jurisdiction in Lewis v King... [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
