Search for: "STATE v BURNS"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 3,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2009, 3:07 pm
But if you're burned out, I understand.) [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
” As the Court of Appeals opined in Capital Newspapers v Burns, 67 N.Y.2d 562, “while an agency is permitted to restrict access to those records falling within the statutory exemptions, the language of the exemption provision contains permissive rather than mandatory language, and it is within the agency's discretion to disclose such records, with or without identifying details, if it so chooses. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Present at thecreation: the 1910 big burn and theformative days of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:26 am
Knoff et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:17 am
Don’t blame trial lawyers and create a false dichotomy of “business v. lawyers. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 pm
United States, 354 U. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Article V The Constitution’s Article V allows for the founding document to be changed through the amendment process. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
"From TM v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 5:48 pm
[4] Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The highest court in Washington State concluded, in Washington v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Nuxoll v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:16 pm
Bush v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:23 pm
See Kahn v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Justices don’t go to the court to start having a book-burning. [read post]
