Search for: "People v Thomas" Results 2301 - 2320 of 5,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am by Benjamin Beaton
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by Erin Miller
  These charges, whether made in judicial opinions, such as Justice Thomas’s dissent in Nixon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Gravante, the attorney who represented Frank Esposito in People v. [read post]