Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 2301 - 2320 of 5,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division rejected the toll collector’s argument that his absences were approved and medically justified and therefore excused for the purposes of maintaining any disciplinary action against him.In Dickinson v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
 | Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Every so often, I run across a particularly striking court opinion, which I think some of our readers might enjoy; here’s one, from a New York intermediate appellate court in 1874, Richards v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 10:58 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
According to the Court of Appeal in the recent case of Palm Springs Villas II Homeowners Association v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:50 am by Bob Kraft
This umbrella acts more like a shield and prevents plaintiffs from personally suing and ruining someone, and the plaintiff will still be fully compensated. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
What kind of jurisdiction does Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, as implemented into the laws of Member States, confer upon national courts? [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Cannabis Law Group
Last year, the Michigan Supreme Court established a four-part test intended to help lower court judges ascertain whether the state’s medical marijuana statute shields a defendant from prosecution. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Tragically, since 2000, an average of approximately 55 police officers have been shot and killed each year in the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]