Search for: "State v. Harris" Results 2321 - 2340 of 5,750
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Daniel Tokaji
This year, in Harris v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:42 am by Mark Tushnet
(John Hart Ely made the strongest possible case for that proposition, in connection with a single case, New York v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am by Steve Erickson
  In reaching its conclusion that COMPAS does not violate due process by using gender (NB: Loomis did not bring an Equal Protection claim) the court highlights its previous decision in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:46 pm by Ad Law Defense
** Is the All State Nationwide Class Back for False Advertising Plaintiffs? [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Executive Power After United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 7:55 am by Eric Goldman
Losing on federal preemption after 4 years of fruitless litigation is extremely embarrassing for Kamala Harris’ office. * Campbell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This part of the inquiry is not about a public debate on, for example, state intervention, natural remedies, or whether there should even be community standards. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm by Schachtman
Rupp, Adjunct Instructor, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, and Senior Research Scientist, Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University – Adam V. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Many labor and employment practitioners expected the Justices to take on the issue in the wake of the Court’s Harris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Erika Bachiochi
First, Roe was first and foremost a victory for doctors, whose rights, Justice Harry Blackmun later suggested, were the real objective of his opinion. [read post]