Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 2341 - 2360 of 6,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2016, 9:22 pm by Patent Docs
Koios Pharmaceuticals LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
With respect to the existence of a “valid license requirement,” see Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712.** There is another limitation on such “summary” termination, however. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
by Jim Martin and Kasey Curtis, about a pair of 9th Circuit opinions (Van Dusen v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
[We’re pleased to have another outstanding guest post by Stephen Carlisle, an entertainment lawyer with over 25 years experience in private practice in the State of Florida. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 9:42 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
In his opinion granting Adnan a new trial, Judge Martin Welch noted that, pursuant to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Curtis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:49 pm by Giles Peaker
Home Group Limited v Jacqueline Emery & anor, Edmonton County Court 08/08/16 (County Court decision unreported elsewhere). [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:09 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
In his opinion granting Adnan a new trial, Judge Martin Welch noted that, pursuant to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Curtis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
But even though, as Judge Martin’s dissent pointed out, the employer conceded that the fee and cost-splitting provision in its arbitration agreement, as well as a six-month statute of limitations, were invalid under USERRA, the majority ruled that the arbitrator, not the district court, must determine the validity of the terms of the arbitration agreement here (Bodine v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
If
26 Jul 2016, 1:13 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
MARTIN LINEN SUPPLY CO., 430 U.S. 564, 572-73 (1977), AND THERE IS INCONSISTENT APPLICATION BETWEEN THE SERVICES OF THE INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO WHEN MEMBERS MUST OR SHOULD CONVICT AN ACCUSED. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 5:24 am by Joy Waltemath
The defendants waived their right to arbitration because they engaged in acts inconsistent with this right, and the plaintiffs were prejudiced (Martin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 10:34 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared on the RLUIPA Defense Blog and is reprinted with permission: https://www.rluipa-defense.com/2016/08/federal-court-rules-alabama-sex-offender-law-is-land-use-regulation-under-rluipa In Martin v. [read post]