Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2361 - 2380 of 178,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘Plaintiffs in this action, a handful of alleged FTX customers, purport to bring claims against Sullivan & Cromwell to recover the same damages for which they are already being compensated through the bankruptcy process,”’ the firm said, asking a federal judge in Florida to dismiss the lawsuit. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:31 am by Lubin and Meyer
The plaintiff a 43-year-old disabled man died from an undiagnosed and untreated aortic aneurysm and dissection. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
” Without much explanation, the court determined that the plaintiff failed to allege that the defendants had “used the plaintiff's name, portrait, picture, or voice within this state for advertising purposes. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
In particular, OpenAI’s strategy has shifted from openness to limiting the amount of information relating to their training datasets. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:54 am by Earl Drott
The court upheld the jury’s verdict, ruling that the plaintiffs evidence did not sufficiently establish that his injuries were caused by the accident. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employee Terminated Upon Return From Medical Leave The case of Krmpotic v Thunder Bay Electronics Limited involved the plaintiff employee (“DK”) , who began working for Thunder Bay Electronics Limited (“TBEL”) as a carpenter in their maintenance department in 1987. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employee Terminated Upon Return From Medical Leave The case of Krmpotic v Thunder Bay Electronics Limited involved the plaintiff employee (“DK”) , who began working for Thunder Bay Electronics Limited (“TBEL”) as a carpenter in their maintenance department in 1987. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Suit was filed last week in a Florida federal district court by a Chabad rabbi and related plaintiffs charging a Homeowners' Association with religious discrimination in violation of state and federal Fair Housing Acts and civil rights protections. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
In reality, if the Plaintiffs premium payment had remained the same, the policy allegedly would have lapsed for insufficient funds in 2020. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
”In this instance, the AT2 noted that the defendant argued that it was not the manufacturer of the product and that J.L. failed to establish “causation” – that the defendant was somehow responsible for the injury by way of its acts or failure to act, and that the injuries were the foreseeable result of defendant’s misconduct.Given that backdrop, the AT2 ended up affirming the dismissal.Did that plaintiffs case have no teeth? [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
It includes useful content on topics including tenant's rights, fair housing and lending, discrimination, immigration, and general non-profit resources. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Instead, in situations where a plaintiff or seller did not purchase or sell a security of an entity about which a material misstatement or omission was made, we propose that the correct approach to Section 10(b) standing looks to the nexus among (i) the plaintiffs purchase or sale transaction, (ii) the alleged misstatement(s) or omission(s), and (iii) the alleged injury. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:09 pm by David Klein
., Plaintiff alleged that he received an unsolicited call from a third-party agency inquiring as to Plaintiffs interest in automotive insurance. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:39 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment, which the court granted in March 2024. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
The majority also held that § 285 does not permit prevailing defendants to recover fees from plaintiffs counsel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 2:11 pm by Saavedra Law Firm, PLC
In our property owner’s scenario, the wet floor must directly cause the plaintiffs injury. [read post]