Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 7,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
Instead, it sued the USOC in federal court for a declaratory judgment affirming its right to engage in Olympic-related chit-chat and to cheer for Olympians that hail from its home state. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
”* The Court of Appeals said the primary issue presented by this appeal as whether Steven Glickman, a candidate for the office of State Senator, satisfies the State Constitution's five-year residency requirement that candidates for legislative office are required to satisfy. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie argues that, although Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s pledge to reverse the effects of the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Posted by Steven A. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:59 am
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Sixth Circuit ruled this week in State of Tennessee v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter recounted this history in their dissenting opinion in Zelman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm
The “Keys Under Doormats” authors are Harold Abelson, Ross Anderson, Steven M. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Then there are cases like Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm
[Steven Greenhut, City Journal] Unconstitutional doings at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) should not be ratified after the fact [Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber, Cato] Temple-Inland, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am
I should note that, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
” Steven Walters, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
§3500), Brady v. [read post]