Search for: "State v. Davi"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 5,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
Davis, 46 So. 3d 152, 154 n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:46 am
By Jay Perry In a case that is emblematic of the potential problems with digital communication during jury trials, the Tennessee Supreme Court has granted review in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am
Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus, and Robert W. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
Supreme Court holding in Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:42 am
Judicial diversion is not automatic, however, as State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:42 am
Judicial diversion is not automatic, however, as State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
About two weeks ago, the entire United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, by a 10-5 vote, declined to exercise en banc review of an important 2024 voting-rights case, Republican National Committee v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
Burton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:24 pm
Cohen, 304 F.3d 563, 569-70 (6th Cir. 2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:17 pm
Davis, 109 F.3d 1281, 1284 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that Title IX has no preemptive power over section 1983 claims), and Seamons v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:44 am
Ammons v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
Davis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:45 pm
Barker, 407 U.S. at 523; see State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am
” At Politico, Burgess Everett reports that “[v]oters in three conservative states where Senate Democrats are up for reelection want their senators to support … Kavanaugh,” according to a new GOP poll. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
Davis (In re Davis), 1998 WL 34066146 (Bankr.S.D.Ga., Jan. 21, 1998) (Dalis, J.); Sanders v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
In Davis v. [read post]