Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2361 - 2380 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2010, 12:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Parker — the first case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Public Use Clause allows the government to condemn property for virtually any reason — involved a federal taking in the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 10:04 am by Prashant Reddy
District Court for the Southern District of New York, from where it was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:01 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The US District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division issued an opinion in a case, illustrative of this tactic. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It lifted an earlier order that it had issued barring a judge in one judicial district in the state from issuing marriage licenses. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bremerton, the conservative justices held that a school district violated the first amendment by penalizing a coach who prayed at midfield after football games. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:26 am by INFORRM
The District Court also ordered OOO Memo to publish the operative part of its judgment on the website. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Russ Bensing
In my Case Update on Monday, I’d mentioned in passing the 2nd District’s decision in State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:04 pm by Hyland Hunt
The court affirmed the district court’s holding that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the officials, because there were insufficient minimum contacts with the United States. [read post]