Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 5,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
In Board of Educ., etc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:46 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit confronted in issue recently in a case involving Ohio tort law, and got it right. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
On the individual rights side, the Guarantee Clause implicitly grants United States citizens who are residents of states the right to vote for state legislative offices. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:38 pm
V&B asserted that her work was essentially exclusive in the mass tort unit of V&BW where she was the senior paralegal and responsible for organizing and directing tasks of other paralegals. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
That standard held that scientific evidence could only be admissible if it was generally accepted by the field in which it belongs. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
R v Ahmad & Anor and R v Fields & Ors, heard 10 – 11 February 2014. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Frank Miniter argues that the Court should hold that warrantless GPS tracking is a violation of the Fourth Amendment in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:48 pm
" As stated in Alice v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 3:16 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:56 am
The United States filed an amicus brief in support of Kurns and Corson. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a court can award to a party who prevails in an action against the United States the “fees and other expenses…incurred by” that party if the position of the United States was not “substantially justified. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:28 pm
The United State Supreme Court has struck down these government attempts to insulate scientific conclusions from cross examination from folks like me. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:56 pm
United States Dep't of Agric., 415 F.3d 1078, 1093 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n, 273 F.3d at 1236.) [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
United States v. [read post]
