Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 221 - 240
of 11,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 7:04 am
" Apparently acknowledging that the decision could be perceived as mean-spirited, the opinion deflects blame by stating that any hardship suffered as a result was "self-imposed" by the applicants.My take:This decision might serve as a lesson to applicants and their counsel not to ignore provisional rejections, and to read carefully the Examiner's Answer on appeal to check for changed conditions affecting rejections. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The reasons for granting the appeal span 92 paragraphs. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:53 am
” The circumstances require an examination of the specific facts in each case because “[t]he conditions giving rise to the resignation must be sufficiently extraordinary and egregious. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 12:00 pm
Read his free ebook The Truth About Hiring A Criminal Defense Lawyer. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:15 am
Aug. 9, 2016), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that patents that expire during a pending re-examination before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) should be examined under the Phillips standard of claim construction, and not the broadest reasonable interpretation (“BRI”) standard. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:01 am
BorgWarner represented by Fish & Richardson lost an appeal at PTAB concerning there-examination of US Patent 6,663,347:This is a decision on appeal by BorgWarner, Inc.2 (hereinafter “PatentOwner”) from the Patent Examiner’s decision to reject pending claims 1-7 inan inter partes reexamination of U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:33 am
Continue Reading › [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:24 pm
After the examiner has rejected the patent application twice, the patent applicant may appeal the matter to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("BPAI"). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:25 am
Continue reading [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:07 am
Ex Parte Azuma Decided September 14, 2009 (Appeal 2009-003902, Appl. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:17 am
A decision of the examining division to correct the text after grant by replacing handwritten text with a “clean copy” does not affect this, and a decision signed by only one member of the examining division is not effective. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:15 pm
Appeals Court To Undo $2.5M Risperdal Verdict,” Law360 (Aug. 8, 2018) (reporting on defendants’ appeal in Pledger, Pa. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Continue reading [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Continue reading [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 11:02 am
Given the standard of review in spousal support appeals, the only ground of appeal that I examined in detail was the appellant’s position that the court failed to apply the principles of support found in Halliwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:12 pm
If you were disqualified for psychological reasons, the first thing you should do is hire an experienced and qualified disqualification appeal lawyer, who thoroughly understands the appeal process and will examine your particular case to determine whether or not you have grounds for a psychological disqualification appeal. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 am
There have been many posts on this blog regarding Examination Under Oath (EUO). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 8:30 am
Continue reading [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:00 am
Continue reading [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:03 am
If you were disqualified for psychological reasons, the first thing you should do is hire an experienced and qualified disqualification appeal lawyer, who thoroughly understands the appeal process and will examine your particular case to determine whether or not you have grounds for a psychological disqualification appeal. [read post]
