Search for: "Com. v. Reason, R." Results 221 - 240 of 411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm by Will Baude
Com’n, 518 F.2d 990, 1013 (5th Cir.1975), aff’d on other grounds, 430 U.S. 442 (1977)”) Newton v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Barry Sookman
– ITBusiness.ca http://t.co/S4hu2ER0gh -> Silicon Valley's Surveillance Cure-All: Transparency http://t.co/WyYphsjgCR -> 8 Reasons to Fear Cloud Computing http://t.co/cpo37pBT7m. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/9guVzqNKyc -> Short phrase not protected by copyright PERSONAL KEEPSAKES v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
The plaintiffs presented an expert witness, Barry R. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-11 | Barry Sookman http://t.co/Cvy8vCt7SF -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-11: RT @AusCopyright: News Alert – High Court delivers reasons f… http://t.co/db5J2oxA2V -> Mandating disclosure of personal information for census purposes no Charter breach R v Finley, 2013 SKCA 47 http://t.co/3STTaTILF7 -> UK company's spyware 'used against Bahrain activist', court papers claim… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
(Note: The following post was originally published on Law360.com on January 15, 2013. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
 The reason for this, and one of the primary goals, was To ensure that patients and their primary caregivers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.1 Largely a failure, in terms of ensuring that it does what the voters voted for it to do, the Compassionate Use Act contained no provisions that prevented the arrest of anyone who obtained and used marijuana for medical purposes upon… [read post]