Search for: "Daniel v. Davis" Results 221 - 240 of 446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
   Other coverage comes from Tony Mauro for the Supreme Court Brief, Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST; commentary comes from Martha Davis at the Human Rights at Home Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Daniel Fisher at Forbes, The Court also issued its decision in Mach Mining v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Berg, Brief of Douglas Laycock, Thomas Berg, David Blankenhorn, Marie Failinger, and Edward Gaffney as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in Same-Sex Marriage Cases (Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v Horton, 9 AD3d 503 [3rd Dept 2004]… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm by Schachtman
Waters, Patricia Laber, Karen Davis-King, Mary M. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
Describing his actions as part of a “fateful, even historic, mission,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in the United States in preparation for his address to Congress on Iran’s nuclear program, which is set for tomorrow. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:25 am by Antonio Zuccaro
Detlef Von Daniels (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)SESSION V (Chair: Kevin Walton)Legal Theory and Global Justice: The Gap. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Sally Peat
In 2008, the House of Lords gave judgment in R v Davis [2008] UKHL 36; [2008] 1 AC 1128. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
At ten a.m. today the Court will hear oral arguments in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Daniel Dupont) apportioned damages in a case involving an asbestos insulator, who smoked heavily, and died of lung cancer. [read post]